Core i7-3960X
VS
Xeon E5-2428L

Core i7-3960X vs Xeon E5-2428L

Intel

Core i7-3960X

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2428L

6 Cores12 Thrd60 WWMax: 2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3960X is positioned at rank 1024 and the Xeon E5-2428L is on rank 800, so the Xeon E5-2428L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3960X

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
37065%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
35023%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
25429%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7661%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6068%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5308%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3040%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3001%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2732%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2732%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2701%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2629%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2592%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2581%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2558%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
91%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
100%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
96%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
96%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
95%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
95%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
95%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
93%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
92%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
90%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
90%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
90%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
90%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2428L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
16924%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3195%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2839%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2193%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
100%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
99%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
99%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
98%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
98%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
97%
#800
Xeon E5-2428L
MSRP: $692|Avg: $42
100%
#803
Opteron 6380
MSRP: $551|Avg: $111
99%
#812
Xeon E3-1220L
MSRP: $189|Avg: $27
97%
#815
Xeon X3450
MSRP: $241|Avg: $39
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($42) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2428L is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
More affordable ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3960X ($60), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($18 less, 43% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+45%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
More affordable ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3960X and Xeon E5-2428L

Intel

Core i7-3960X

The Core i7-3960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,402 points. Launch price was $861.

Intel

Xeon E5-2428L

The Xeon E5-2428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,500 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3960X and Xeon E5-2428L share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3960X versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2428L — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-3960X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-3960X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3960X scores 8,402 against the Xeon E5-2428L's 8,500 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2428L. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3960X vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2428L.

FeatureCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+95%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+83%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)
15360 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
8,402
8,500+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
658
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,973
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3960X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3960X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2428L).

FeatureCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3960X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2428L debuted at $692. At current prices ($60 vs $42), the Xeon E5-2428L is $18 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3960X delivers 140.0 pts/$ vs 202.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2428L — making the Xeon E5-2428L the 36.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3960XXeon E5-2428L
MSRP
$999
$692-31%
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$42-30%
Performance per Dollar
140.0
202.4+45%
Release Date
2011
2012