Core i7-3960X
VS
EPYC 8324PN

Core i7-3960X vs EPYC 8324PN

Intel

Core i7-3960X

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2011
VS
AMD

EPYC 8324PN

32 Cores64 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3960X is positioned at rank 1024 and the EPYC 8324PN is on rank 613, so the EPYC 8324PN offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3960X

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
37065%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
35023%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
25429%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7661%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6068%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5308%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3040%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3001%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2732%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2732%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2701%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2629%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2592%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2581%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2558%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
91%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
100%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
96%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
96%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
95%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
95%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
95%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
93%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
92%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
90%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
90%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
90%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
90%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8324PN

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9925%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1874%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1665%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1286%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
99%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
98%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
96%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
94%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
94%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
94%
#613
EPYC 8324PN
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
98%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
95%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 8324PN (2023) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-3960XEPYC 8324PN
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3960X (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-3960XEPYC 8324PN
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3960X and EPYC 8324PN

Intel

Core i7-3960X

The Core i7-3960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,402 points. Launch price was $861.

AMD

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3960X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 8324PN offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3960X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-3960X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The Core i7-3960X uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the EPYC 8324PN uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3960X scores 8,402 against the EPYC 8324PN's 8,375 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3960X. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-3960X vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN.

FeatureCore i7-3960XEPYC 8324PN
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
32 / 64+433%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+30%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+61%
2.05 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)
128 MB (total)+753%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
5 nm-84%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
8,402
8,375
Geekbench 6 Single
658
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,973
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3960X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the EPYC 8324PN uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3960XEPYC 8324PN
Socket
LGA2011
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3960X) / not specified (EPYC 8324PN).

FeatureCore i7-3960XEPYC 8324PN
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes