Core i7-860S
VS
A10-9600P

Core i7-860S vs A10-9600P

Intel

Core i7-860S

4 Cores8 Thrd82 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A10-9600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-860S is positioned at rank 1033 and the A10-9600P is on rank 572, so the A10-9600P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-860S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
40118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
37907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
27524%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8292%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6568%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5746%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3291%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3248%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2957%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2957%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2924%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2845%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2794%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2769%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
99%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
100%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
98%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
98%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
97%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
97%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
95%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
93%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
92%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
91%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9600P

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
99%
#560
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
755%
#561
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
744%
#562
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
683%
#563
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
680%
#564
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
673%
#566
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
650%
#567
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
623%
#568
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
622%
#569
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
606%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-9600P (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-860SA10-9600P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-860S (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-860SA10-9600P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+93%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-860S and A10-9600P

Intel

Core i7-860S

The Core i7-860S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,324 points. Launch price was $422.

AMD

A10-9600P

The A10-9600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Core i7-860S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-9600P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860S versus 3.3 GHz on the A10-9600P — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-860S (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-860S uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-9600P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-860S scores 2,324 against the A10-9600P's 2,333 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-9600P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 451 vs 469, a 3.9% lead for the A10-9600P that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCore i7-860SA10-9600P
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz+5%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+5%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,324
2,333
Geekbench 6 Single
451
469+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,332
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-860S uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-9600P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-860S versus DDR4-1866 on the A10-9600P — the A10-9600P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-860S) vs 8 (A10-9600P) — the Core i7-860S offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-860SA10-9600P
Socket
LGA1156
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-860S) vs AMD-V (A10-9600P). The A10-9600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Core i7-860S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9600P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9600P rivals Core i3-6006U.

FeatureCore i7-860SA10-9600P
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-860S launched at $299 MSRP, while the A10-9600P debuted at $128. At current prices ($96 vs $50), the A10-9600P is $46 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-860S delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 46.7 pts/$ for the A10-9600P — making the A10-9600P the 63.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-860SA10-9600P
MSRP
$299
$128-57%
Avg Price (30d)
$96
$50-48%
Performance per Dollar
24.2
46.7+93%
Release Date
2010
2016