Core i7-860S
VS
Xeon E5-2603

Core i7-860S vs Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core i7-860S

4 Cores8 Thrd82 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-860S is positioned at rank 1033 and the Xeon E5-2603 is on rank 825, so the Xeon E5-2603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-860S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
40118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
37907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
27524%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8292%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6568%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5746%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3291%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3248%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2957%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2957%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2924%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2845%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2794%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2769%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
99%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
100%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
98%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
98%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
97%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
97%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
95%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
93%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
92%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
91%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17870%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3374%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2998%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2316%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
99%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
98%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
98%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
97%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
95%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
94%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
93%
#825
Xeon E5-2603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
95%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-860SXeon E5-2603
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-860S ($96), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($96 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-860SXeon E5-2603
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($96)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-860S and Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core i7-860S

The Core i7-860S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,324 points. Launch price was $422.

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

The Xeon E5-2603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,325 points. Launch price was $207.

Processing Power

The Core i7-860S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2603's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860S versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 — a 63.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-860S (base: 2.53 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-860S uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-860S scores 2,324 against the Xeon E5-2603's 2,325 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2603. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-860S vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603.

FeatureCore i7-860SXeon E5-2603
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz+92%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+41%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
2,324
2,325
Geekbench 6 Single
451
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,332
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-860S uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-860SXeon E5-2603
Socket
LGA1156
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-860S) / not specified (Xeon E5-2603).

FeatureCore i7-860SXeon E5-2603
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes