Core i7-870
VS
Core i7-4600M

Core i7-870 vs Core i7-4600M

Intel

Core i7-870

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-4600M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-870 is positioned at rank 987 and the Core i7-4600M is on rank 71, so the Core i7-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-870

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29546%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27918%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20271%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6107%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4837%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4232%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2424%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2392%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2178%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2178%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2153%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2095%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2066%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2058%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2039%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
97%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
100%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
99%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
97%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
97%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
97%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
96%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
96%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
95%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
92%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4600M

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
94%
#59
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
229%
#60
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
226%
#61
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
207%
#62
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
206%
#63
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
204%
#65
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
197%
#66
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
189%
#67
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
189%
#68
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
184%
#71
Core i7-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
98%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-4600M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-870 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-870Core i7-4600M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-870Core i7-4600M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-870 and Core i7-4600M

Intel

Core i7-870

The Core i7-870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,164 points. Launch price was $305.

Intel

Core i7-4600M

The Core i7-4600M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,204 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

The Core i7-870 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4600M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-870 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4600M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-870 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-4600M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-870 scores 3,164 against the Core i7-4600M's 3,204 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-4600M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 476 vs 1,025, a 73.2% lead for the Core i7-4600M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,541 vs 2,132 (32.2% advantage for the Core i7-4600M). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-870 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600M.

FeatureCore i7-870Core i7-4600M
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.93 GHz+1%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,164
3,204+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
476
1,025+115%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,541
2,132+38%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-870 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4600M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-870 versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i7-4600M — the Core i7-4600M supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4600M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i7-870) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i7-4600M).

FeatureCore i7-870Core i7-4600M
Socket
LGA1156
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-870) vs true (Core i7-4600M). The Core i7-4600M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-870 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i7-4600M targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-870Core i7-4600M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Mobile