
Core i7-870

FX-4320
Core i7-870 vs FX-4320 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-870 vs FX-4320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-870 vs FX-4320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-870
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike FX-4320.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
FX-4320
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-870 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,150 vs 3,164).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-870.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-870 better than FX-4320?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-870 vs FX-4320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-870
The Core i7-870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,164 points. Launch price was $305.

FX-4320
The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-870 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-4320's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870 versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 — a 13% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-870 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-870 scores 3,164 against the FX-4320's 3,150 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-870. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-870 vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.
| Feature | Core i7-870 | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 4 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4096 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,164 | 3,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 476 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,541 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-870 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-870 | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-870) / not specified (FX-4320). Primary use case: Core i7-870 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-870 | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-870 was priced at $300, while the FX-4320 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($300 vs $250), FX-4320 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-870 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 12.6 pts/$ for the FX-4320 — making the FX-4320 the 17.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-870 | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $250-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 12.6+20% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















