Core i7-870 vs FirePro A320

Intel

Core i7-870

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FirePro A320

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-870 vs FirePro A320 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-870 vs FirePro A320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-870 vs FirePro A320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-870

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +39.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 95W instead of 100W, a 5W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike FirePro A320.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while FirePro A320 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

FirePro A320

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-870 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,153 vs 3,164).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-870.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-870 better than FirePro A320?
    Yes. Core i7-870 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 39.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 47% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-870 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 39.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-870 is the stronger fit. You are getting 47% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-870 is the better buy right now. Core i7-870 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 39.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    FirePro A320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i7-870 vs FirePro A320 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-870

    The Core i7-870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,164 points. Launch price was $305.

    AMD

    FirePro A320

    The FirePro A320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,153 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-870 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FirePro A320's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870 versus 4.2 GHz on the FirePro A320 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the FirePro A320 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-870 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FirePro A320 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-870 scores 3,164 against the FirePro A320's 2,153 — a 38% lead for the Core i7-870.

    FeatureCore i7-870FirePro A320
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz
    4.2 GHz+17%
    Base Clock
    2.93 GHz
    3.8 GHz+30%
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    4 MB (total)+1500%
    Process
    45 nm
    32 nm-29%
    Architecture
    Lynnfield (2009−2010)
    Trinity (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    3,164+47%
    2,153
    Geekbench 6 Single
    476
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,541
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-870 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FirePro A320 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-870FirePro A320
    Socket
    LGA1156
    FM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-870) / not specified (FirePro A320). Primary use case: Core i7-870 targets Legacy Desktop.

    FeatureCore i7-870FirePro A320
    Integrated GPU
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Legacy Desktop