Core i7-8700B vs Xeon E5-2650 v3

Intel

Core i7-8700B

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v3

10 Cores20 Thrd105 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-8700B vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8700B vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8700B vs Xeon E5-2650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8700B

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2650 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
  • Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2650 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700B across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (11,662 vs 11,795).
  • 61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8700B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8700B better than Xeon E5-2650 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2650 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8700B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8700B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8700B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-8700B is the better buy right now. Core i7-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $303 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-8700B vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-8700B

The Core i7-8700B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,795 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v3

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-8700B packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-8700B versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-8700B uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8700B scores 11,795 against the Xeon E5-2650 v3's 11,662 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-8700B. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-8700B vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3.

FeatureCore i7-8700BXeon E5-2650 v3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+53%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
11,795+1%
11,662
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8700B uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8700B versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — the Core i7-8700B supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-8700B) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v3). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-8700B) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v3) — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-8700BXeon E5-2650 v3
Socket
BGA1440
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+25%
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
40+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8700B) / not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v3). The Core i7-8700B includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8700B targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-8700BXeon E5-2650 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile