Core i7-880
VS
Core i3-7100H

Core i7-880 vs Core i3-7100H

Intel

Core i7-880

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i3-7100H

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-880 is positioned at rank 1064 and the Core i3-7100H is on rank 522, so the Core i3-7100H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-880

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
53013%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
50092%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
36371%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10957%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7593%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4349%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4292%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3908%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3907%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3864%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3760%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3707%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3692%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3659%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
100%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
100%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
98%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
97%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
96%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
96%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
92%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
85%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
84%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
81%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
79%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
73%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
69%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
68%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#510
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
680%
#511
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
670%
#512
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
615%
#513
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
613%
#514
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
607%
#516
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
586%
#517
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
562%
#518
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
561%
#519
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
546%
#522
Core i3-7100H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100H (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-880Core i3-7100H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-H (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-880 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-880Core i3-7100H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-880 and Core i3-7100H

Intel

Core i7-880

The Core i7-880 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,429 points. Launch price was $583.

Intel

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

The Core i7-880 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-7100H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-880 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Core i7-880 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H — a 28.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-880 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-880 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-7100H uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-880 scores 3,429 against the Core i3-7100H's 3,450 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-7100H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 507 vs 1,011, a 66.4% lead for the Core i3-7100H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-880 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100H.

FeatureCore i7-880Core i3-7100H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.73 GHz+33%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.06 GHz+2%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark
3,429
3,450
Geekbench 6 Single
507
1,011+99%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,478
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-880 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-880 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H — the Core i3-7100H supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i7-880) and HM175,QM175,CM238 (Core i3-7100H).

FeatureCore i7-880Core i3-7100H
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-880) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H). The Core i3-7100H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-880 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U.

FeatureCore i7-880Core i3-7100H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Laptop