Core i7-940XM vs Celeron G3930

Core i7-940XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010

Celeron G3930

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-940XM

4 / 8

2,269

+0.4%

2,259

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-940XM is positioned at rank 1237 and the Celeron G3930 is on rank 395, so the Celeron G3930 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940XM

#1225

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

14174%

#1226

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

13966%

#1227

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

12821%

#1228

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

12763%

#1229

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

12646%

#1231

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

12213%

#1232

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

11710%

#1233

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

11691%

#1234

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

11377%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

100%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

98%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

89%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

82%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

5795%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

5476%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

3976%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

1198%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

949%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

830%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

475%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

469%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

427%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

427%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

422%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

411%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

405%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

404%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

400%

#226

Ryzen 5 1600X

MSRP: $249|Avg: $144

97%

#334

Core i3-9100

MSRP: $122|Avg: $125

98%

#335

Core i9-10900X

MSRP: $590|Avg: $425

98%

#336

Core i7-8700T

MSRP: $303|Avg: $196

97%

#337

Ryzen 5 3600XT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $357

97%

#395

Celeron G3930

MSRP: $42|Avg: $25

100%

#396

Ryzen 3 1300X

MSRP: $129|Avg: $54

100%

#400

Phenom II X3 710

MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A

99%

#402

A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A

99%

#403

Celeron G3930TE

MSRP: $42|Avg: $29

98%

#410

Core i3-8100

MSRP: $117|Avg: $45

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3930 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core i7-940XM	Celeron G3930
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)	✅ More affordable ($25)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)	✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-940XM (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core i7-940XM	Celeron G3930
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+4265%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)	✅ More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-940XM Benchmark Check

Celeron G3930 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-940XM and Celeron G3930

Core i7-940XM

The Core i7-940XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-940XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Celeron G3930 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-940XM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-940XM versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-940XM (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-940XM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3930 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940XM scores 2,269 against the Celeron G3930's 2,259 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-940XM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-940XM vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930.

Feature	Core i7-940XM	Celeron G3930
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.33 GHz+15%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.9 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+300%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Clarksfield (2009−2010)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,269	2,259
Geekbench 6 Single	—	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-940XM versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930 — the Core i7-940XM supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-940XM) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930).

Feature	Core i7-940XM	Celeron G3930
Socket	PGA988	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333+33225%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	8	64 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-940XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-940XM) vs VT-x (Celeron G3930). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core i7-940XM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-940XM rivals Core i7-2720QM; Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.