Core i7-940XM
VS
E2-7110

Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110

Intel

Core i7-940XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

E2-7110

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-940XM is positioned at rank 1237 and the E2-7110 is on rank 584, so the E2-7110 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940XM

#1225
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
14174%
#1226
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
13966%
#1227
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
12821%
#1228
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
12763%
#1229
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
12646%
#1231
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
12213%
#1232
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
11710%
#1233
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
11691%
#1234
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
11377%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
100%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
98%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-7110

#572
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
771%
#573
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
760%
#574
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
698%
#575
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
695%
#576
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
688%
#578
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
665%
#579
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
637%
#580
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
636%
#581
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
619%
#584
E2-7110
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-940XM leads in gaming performance. However, the E2-7110 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-940XME2-7110
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-940XME2-7110
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-940XM and E2-7110

Intel

Core i7-940XM

The Core i7-940XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $1,096.

AMD

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i7-940XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the E2-7110's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-940XM versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 59.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-940XM. The Core i7-940XM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940XM scores 2,269 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.6% lead for the E2-7110.

FeatureCore i7-940XME2-7110
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz+85%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark
2,269
2,282
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-940XME2-7110
Socket
PGA988
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-940XM) / not specified (E2-7110). Direct competitor: Core i7-940XM rivals Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureCore i7-940XME2-7110
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true