Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110

Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-940XM

4 / 8

2,269

0.0%

2,282

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-940XM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,269 vs 2,282).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,096 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Core i7-940XM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-940XM is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,096 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Core i7-940XM only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-940XM vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-940XM

The Core i7-940XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $1,096.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-940XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the E2-7110's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-940XM versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 59.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-940XM. The Core i7-940XM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940XM scores 2,269 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.6% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	Core i7-940XM	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.33 GHz+85%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Clarksfield (2009−2010)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,269	2,282

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.