Core i7-940XM
VS
Opteron 3260 HE

Core i7-940XM vs Opteron 3260 HE

Intel

Core i7-940XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Opteron 3260 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-940XM is positioned at rank 1237 and the Opteron 3260 HE is on rank 214, so the Opteron 3260 HE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940XM

#1225
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
14174%
#1226
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
13966%
#1227
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
12821%
#1228
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
12763%
#1229
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
12646%
#1231
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
12213%
#1232
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
11710%
#1233
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
11691%
#1234
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
11377%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
100%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
98%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3260 HE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3641%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
687%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
611%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
472%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
#214
Opteron 3260 HE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 3260 HE delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-940XM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-940XMOpteron 3260 HE
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-940XMOpteron 3260 HE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,096)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-940XM and Opteron 3260 HE

Intel

Core i7-940XM

The Core i7-940XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $1,096.

AMD

Opteron 3260 HE

The Opteron 3260 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $125.

Processing Power

The Core i7-940XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Opteron 3260 HE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-940XM versus 3.7 GHz on the Opteron 3260 HE — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Opteron 3260 HE (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-940XM uses the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron 3260 HE uses Zurich (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940XM scores 2,269 against the Opteron 3260 HE's 2,283 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 3260 HE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-940XM vs 4 MB (total) on the Opteron 3260 HE.

FeatureCore i7-940XMOpteron 3260 HE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.33 GHz
3.7 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.7 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Zurich (2012)
PassMark
2,269
2,283
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3260 HE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-940XMOpteron 3260 HE
Socket
PGA988
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-940XM) / not specified (Opteron 3260 HE). Direct competitor: Core i7-940XM rivals Core i7-2720QM.

FeatureCore i7-940XMOpteron 3260 HE
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true