Core i7-970 vs FX-8120
Core i7-970
FX-8120
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-970 is positioned at rank 1063 and the FX-8120 is on rank 567, so the FX-8120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-970
Performance Per Dollar FX-8120
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($289) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+628%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($289) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-970 and FX-8120
Core i7-970
The Core i7-970 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $662.
FX-8120
The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-970 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the FX-8120 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8120 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-970 versus 4 GHz on the FX-8120 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the FX-8120 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-970 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-8120 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-970 scores 6,547 against the FX-8120's 6,594 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-8120. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-970 vs 8192 kB on the FX-8120.
| Feature | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz | 4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8192 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 6,547 | 6,594 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-970 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-8120 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 3 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 36 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-970) / not specified (FX-8120). Primary use case: Core i7-970 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-970 launched at $1083 MSRP, while the FX-8120 debuted at $205. At current prices ($289 vs $40), the FX-8120 is $249 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-970 delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 164.8 pts/$ for the FX-8120 — making the FX-8120 the 151.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-970 | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083 | $205-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $40-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7 | 164.8+626% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-970 and FX-8120
