Core i7-9700 vs Ryzen Embedded V2516
Core i7-9700
Ryzen Embedded V2516
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2516
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+98%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($300) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516
Core i7-9700
The Core i7-9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,206 points. Launch price was $323.
Ryzen Embedded V2516
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,329 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-9700 versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700 uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700 scores 13,206 against the Ryzen Embedded V2516's 13,329 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2516. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2516.
| Feature | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+19% | 3.95 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,206 | 13,329 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,540 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,570 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,202 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2516). The Core i7-9700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700 launched at $333 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2516 debuted at $300. At current prices ($150 vs $300), the Core i7-9700 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700 delivers 88.0 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2516 — making the Core i7-9700 the 65.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700 | Ryzen Embedded V2516 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $333 | $300-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.0+98% | 44.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-9700 and Ryzen Embedded V2516
