
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-10700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,561).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
Core i7-10700K
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 28.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($387 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$387 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-10700K
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 28.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($387 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,561).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $387 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌0.5% HIGHER MSRP$387 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700K better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 275 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 464 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-10700K

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-10700K
Core i7-10700K
The Core i7-10700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,561 points. Launch price was $400.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i7-10700K's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700K — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10700K uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-10700K's 18,561 — a 25.3% lead for the Core i7-10700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700K.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 18,561+29% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,144 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,290 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,404 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10700K uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Intel 400 Series,Intel 500 Series (Core i7-10700K).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs Yes (Core i7-10700K). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-10700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core i7-10700K targets Gaming/Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700K rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming/Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-10700K debuted at $387. On MSRP ($385 vs $387), the Core i7-9700K is $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700K — making the Core i7-10700K the 24.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $387 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 48.0+28% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












