
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700T across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 21,195).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Core i7-12700T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($339 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-12700T
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($339 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700T across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 21,195).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700T better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-12700T

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-12700T
Core i7-12700T
The Core i7-12700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,195 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-12700T offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12700T — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-12700T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-12700T's 21,195 — a 38.2% lead for the Core i7-12700T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700T.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 20+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+157% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 21,195+47% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,568 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,256 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,560 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-12700T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12700T — the Core i7-12700T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i7-12700T) — the Core i7-12700T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and LGA1700 (Core i7-12700T).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-12700T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700T debuted at $339. On MSRP ($385 vs $339), the Core i7-12700T is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 62.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700T — making the Core i7-12700T the 50.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $339-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 62.5+67% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












