
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-14700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 40,934).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 106.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Core i7-14700
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 185.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-14700
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 185.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 40,934).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 106.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 841 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 599 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-14700

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-14700
Core i7-14700
The Core i7-14700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 40,934 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-14700 offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-14700 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700 — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-14700 uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-14700's 40,934 — a 95.9% lead for the Core i7-14700. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 20 / 28+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 33 MB (total)+175% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 40,934+184% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-14700 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5600 on the Core i7-14700 — the Core i7-14700 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-14700 supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Core i7-14700) — the Core i7-14700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Z790,B760 (Core i7-14700).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+69904967% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-14700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700 rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-14700 debuted at $384. On MSRP ($385 vs $384), the Core i7-14700 is $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 106.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-14700 — making the Core i7-14700 the 96.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-14700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $384 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 106.6+185% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












