PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 8300G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 3 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 8300G needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 3 8300G?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 3 8300G makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-9700K is 118.8% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $176 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 8300G is also 114.4% better value on MSRP (80.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM5 + DDR5 setup, Ryzen 3 8300G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 8300G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 8300G Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
1080p
low	308 FPS	262 FPS
medium	278 FPS	232 FPS
high	231 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	229 FPS
medium	221 FPS	184 FPS
high	178 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	159 FPS
medium	140 FPS	129 FPS
high	108 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 8300G

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
1080p
low	360 FPS	347 FPS
medium	321 FPS	280 FPS
high	291 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	286 FPS
medium	282 FPS	238 FPS
high	258 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	176 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	212 FPS
medium	221 FPS	183 FPS
high	208 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 8300G

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
1080p
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	353 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	353 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	292 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 8300G

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
1080p
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	353 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	353 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	360 FPS	353 FPS
high	360 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	353 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 8300G

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 3 8300G

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 3 8300G

The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark	14,397+2%	14,113

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
Socket	LGA1151	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 3 8300G). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 8300G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 8300G
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300G debuted at $176. On MSRP ($385 vs $176), the Ryzen 3 8300G is $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 80.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300G — making the Ryzen 3 8300G the 72.8% better value option.