
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 34,585).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 34,585).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 82.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 34,585+140% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Desktop | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($385 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $385 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











