Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E-2146G

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E-2146G

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E-2146G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E-2146G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E-2146G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2146G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E-2146G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E-2146G.

Xeon E-2146G

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
  • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700K.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,240 vs 14,397).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon E-2146G?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2146G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 27.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2146G is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E-2146G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Xeon E-2146G

The Xeon E-2146G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,240 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2146G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2146G — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2146G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E-2146G's 13,240 — a 8.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E-2146G
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+9%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark
14,397+9%
13,240
Geekbench 6 Single
1,557
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,385
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C242,C246 (Xeon E-2146G).

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E-2146G
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs Yes (Xeon E-2146G). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics P630 (Xeon E-2146G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E-2146G
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Desktop