Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2618L v4

10 Cores20 Thrd75 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +37.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $394 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
  • Delivers 134.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2618L v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • 26.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 75W.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Draws 75W instead of 95W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 14,397).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 37.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in $394 cheaper on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 37.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 134.4% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 16.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 76.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 14.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+123%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB+108%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+10140%
2.5 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
14,397+16%
12,429
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2618L v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 came in at $779. On launch pricing ($385 vs $779), Core i7-9700K was $394 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — making the Core i7-9700K the 80.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP
$385-51%
$779
Performance per Dollar
37.4+134%
16.0
Release Date
2018
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.