
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2679 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,317 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 318.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2679 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,131).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+316.7% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon E5-2679 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,317 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 318.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2679 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+316.7% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2679 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,131).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2679 v4 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2679 v4

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon E5-2679 v4
Xeon E5-2679 v4
The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 50.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+48% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 50 MB+317% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 5 MB+1900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 24,131+68% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($385 vs $2702), the Core i7-9700K is $2317 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Core i7-9700K the 122.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2679 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-86% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+320% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












