
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6448Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,198 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 225W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Gold 6448Y needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448Y across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 60,449).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6448Y, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6448Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌136.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,198 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 225W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Gold 6448Y needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448Y across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 60,449).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6448Y, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6448Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌136.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6448Y better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1006 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 929 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 843 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 780 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 710 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 638 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 756 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 367 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon Gold 6448Y

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y
The Xeon Gold 6448Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,449 points. Launch price was $3,583.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6448Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6448Y has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448Y — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6448Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon Gold 6448Y's 60,449 — a 123.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6448Y. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448Y.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+20% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 60 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 60,449+320% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6448Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6448Y — the Xeon Gold 6448Y supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6448Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6448Y). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6448Y) — the Xeon Gold 6448Y offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448Y).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 80+400% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6448Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Gold 6448Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6448Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6448Y debuted at $3583. On MSRP ($385 vs $3583), the Core i7-9700K is $3198 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448Y — making the Core i7-9700K the 75.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-89% | $3583 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+121% | 16.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












