
Core i7-9700K

Xeon Platinum 8481C
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon Platinum 8481C Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon Platinum 8481C FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon Platinum 8481C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Platinum 8481C needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 105 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8481C, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8481C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8481C moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8481C
2023Why buy it
- β +775% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads.
- β Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (11,681 vs 14,397).
- β268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon Platinum 8481C?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon Platinum 8481C Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon Platinum 8481C
The Xeon Platinum 8481C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,681 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8481C offers 56 cores / 112 threads β the Xeon Platinum 8481C has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8481C β a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon Platinum 8481C's 11,681 β a 20.8% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8481C.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Platinum 8481C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 56 / 112+600% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+29% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 105 MB+775% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 14,397+23% | 11,681 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Platinum 8481C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8481C). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Platinum 8481C |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













