
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2235
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2235, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,235 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon W-2235
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $555 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2235, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,235 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($555 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon W-2235?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-2235

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon W-2235
Xeon W-2235
The Xeon W-2235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,235 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-2235 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2235 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon W-2235's 14,235 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2235.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+45% | 8.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,397+1% | 14,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2235 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon W-2235). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-2235 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2235 debuted at $555. On MSRP ($385 vs $555), the Core i7-9700K is $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2235 — making the Core i7-9700K the 37.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-31% | $555 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+46% | 25.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












