
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon w5-2555X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $684 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 252W, a 157W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon w5-2555X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 47,638).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 34 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2555X, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +89.0% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (34 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Delivers 19.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,069 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌165.3% higher power demand at 252W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon w5-2555X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $684 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 252W, a 157W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon w5-2555X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +89.0% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (34 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Delivers 19.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2555X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 47,638).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 34 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2555X, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 44.6 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌177.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,069 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌165.3% higher power demand at 252W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-2555X better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1191 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 1136 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 953 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 859 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 420 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1191 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 982 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1023 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 733 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon w5-2555X

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon w5-2555X
Xeon w5-2555X
The Xeon w5-2555X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 252 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 47,638 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon w5-2555X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon w5-2555X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2555X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon w5-2555X's 47,638 — a 107.2% lead for the Xeon w5-2555X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon w5-2555X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 33.75 MB Intel® Smart Cache+181% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 47,638+231% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-2555X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2555X — the Xeon w5-2555X supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2555X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2555X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2555X) — the Xeon w5-2555X offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and W790 (Xeon w5-2555X).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 112+600% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-2555X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon w5-2555X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-2555X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-2555X debuted at $1069. On MSRP ($385 vs $1069), the Core i7-9700K is $684 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 44.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2555X — making the Xeon w5-2555X the 17.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-2555X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-64% | $1069 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 44.6+19% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












