
Core i7-9700K

Xeon X7560
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon X7560 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon X7560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon X7560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon X7560 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7560, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon X7560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon X7560
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,110 vs 14,397).
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon X7560?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon X7560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon X7560
The Xeon X7560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 8,110 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon X7560's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon X7560 — a 58.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon X7560's 8,110 — a 55.9% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 24 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7560.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon X7560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+84% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+59% | 2.27 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB L3 Cache+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,397+78% | 8,110 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7560 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X7560 — the Core i7-9700K supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Xeon X7560). Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Nehalem-EX (Xeon X7560).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon X7560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1567 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+100% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7560). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Xeon X7560 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7560 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon X7560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













