Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel

Core i7-9700KF

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 4600H

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700KF

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +45.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $374 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 4600H

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (14,173 vs 14,250).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700KF better than Ryzen 5 4600H?
Yes. Core i7-9700KF is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 45.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 45.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700KF is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700KF comes in at an unclear MSRP at $374 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 45.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 4600H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700KF

The Core i7-9700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,250 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen 5 4600H

The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700KF packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700KF versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700KF uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700KF scores 14,250 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-9700KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700KF vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.

FeatureCore i7-9700KFRyzen 5 4600H
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+23%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
14,250
14,173
Geekbench 6 Single
1,659
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,072
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700KF uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KFRyzen 5 4600H
Socket
LGA1151
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700KF) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4600H).

FeatureCore i7-9700KFRyzen 5 4600H
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d