
Core i7-9800X

Core Ultra 5 238V
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 5 238V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 5 238V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 5 238V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9800X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅450% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 40.1 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $454 MSRP).
- ❌870.6% higher power demand at 165W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 238V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 238V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $135 less on MSRP ($454 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.1 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($454 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 165W, a 148W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 130V, while Core i7-9800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 13,067).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9800X better than Core Ultra 5 238V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 5 238V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9800X
The Core i7-9800X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,128 points. Launch price was $589.

Core Ultra 5 238V
The Core Ultra 5 238V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,219 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 238V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9800X versus 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 238V — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9800X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 238V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9800X scores 18,128 against the Core Ultra 5 238V's 18,219 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,067 vs 10,000 (26.6% advantage for the Core i7-9800X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,372 vs 2,683, a 64.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,552 vs 10,130 (29.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V). L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i7-9800X vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 238V.
| Feature | Core i7-9800X | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+106% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 18,128 | 18,219 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,067+31% | 10,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,372 | 2,683+96% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,552 | 10,130+34% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9800X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 238V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9800X versus LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 238V — the Core Ultra 5 238V supports 220.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i7-9800X) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 238V). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i7-9800X) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 238V) — the Core i7-9800X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i7-9800X) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 238V).
| Feature | Core i7-9800X | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5x-8533+220% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+450% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-9800X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 238V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 130V), while the Core i7-9800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9800X targets Workstation, Core Ultra 5 238V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-9800X rivals Ryzen 5 3600XT; Core Ultra 5 238V rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core i7-9800X | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Arc Graphics 130V |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Productivity |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9800X was priced at $589, while the Core Ultra 5 238V came in at $454. On launch pricing ($589 vs $454), Core Ultra 5 238V was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9800X delivers 30.8 pts/$ vs 40.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 238V — making the Core Ultra 5 238V the 26.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9800X | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589 | $454-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 40.1+30% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















