Core i7-9800X vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9800X vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9800X vs Xeon E5-2697 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9800X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,128 vs 18,182).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $589 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+112.1% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
✅Draws 145W instead of 165W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9800X better than Xeon E5-2697 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2697 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9800X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2697 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 112.1% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9800X is the better buy right now. Core i7-9800X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $589 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2697 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9800X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-9800X vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9800X

The Core i7-9800X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,128 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,182 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9800X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v3 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-9800X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9800X scores 18,128 against the Xeon E5-2697 v3's 18,182 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2697 v3. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i7-9800X vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v3.

Feature	Core i7-9800X	Xeon E5-2697 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+25%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16.5 MB (total)	35 MB (total)+112%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	18,128	18,182
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,067	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,372	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,552	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9800X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9800X	Xeon E5-2697 v3
Socket	LGA2066	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	44	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v3). Primary use case: Core i7-9800X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-9800X rivals Ryzen 5 3600XT.