Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 7 5825C

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10885H

8 / 16

14,448

0.0%

14,561

+0.8%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10885H

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,448 vs 14,561).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i9-10885H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i9-10885H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Core i9-10885H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10885H is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 5825C also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-10885H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10885H

The Core i9-10885H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,448 points. Launch price was $556.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-10885H and Ryzen 7 5825C share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10885H versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10885H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-10885H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10885H scores 14,448 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-10885H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

Feature	Core i9-10885H	Ryzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+13%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark	14,448	14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,551
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,145

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10885H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-10885H	Ryzen 7 5825C
Socket	BGA1440	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10885H) / Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i9-10885H requires a dedicated GPU.