Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10885H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10885H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10885H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100F

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-10885H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10885H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Core i9-10885H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌28.9% higher power demand at 58W vs 45W.

Core i9-10885H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 58W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,448 vs 14,649).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100F better than Core i9-10885H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10885H is ahead with a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $109 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-10885H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (134.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10885H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F

The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Core i9-10885H

The Core i9-10885H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,448 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-10885H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10885H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10885H — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10885H (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10885H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Core i9-10885H's 14,448 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-13100F. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10885H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	5.1 GHz+13%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	14,649+1%	14,448
Geekbench 6 Single	2,272	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10885H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10885H
Socket	LGA1700	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—