
Core i3-13100F

Xeon W-1290TE
Core i3-13100F vs Xeon W-1290TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100F vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100F vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+205.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $443 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 134.4 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon W-1290TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Core i3-13100F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,478 vs 7,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 134.4 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-13100F better than Xeon W-1290TE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100F vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F
The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Xeon W-1290TE
The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-13100F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,272 vs 2,507, a 9.8% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 2,478 (101.4% advantage for the Core i3-13100F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100F vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+89% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,649 | 14,505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,272 | 2,507+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577+206% | 2,478 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Core i3-13100F supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-13100F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-13100F) vs 16 (Xeon W-1290TE) — the Core i3-13100F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i3-13100F) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-13100F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Core i3-13100F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100F was priced at $109, while the Xeon W-1290TE came in at $552. On launch pricing ($109 vs $552), Core i3-13100F was $443 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100F delivers 134.4 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Core i3-13100F the 134.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Xeon W-1290TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-80% | $552 |
| Performance per Dollar | 134.4+411% | 26.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














