PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100F

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 134.4 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i3-13100F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,476 vs 7,577).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 122.7 vs 134.4 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-13100F better than Core i9-10900T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10900T is ahead with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F pulls ahead with 1.4% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i9-10900T also has the bigger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-13100F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-13100F is the better buy right now. Core i3-13100F comes in $11 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $120 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Core i9-10900T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.5% better value on MSRP (134.4 vs 122.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100F vs Core i9-10900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F

The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-10900T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i3-13100F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Core i9-10900T's 14,727 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,272 vs 1,710, a 28.2% lead for the Core i3-13100F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 7,476 (1.3% advantage for the Core i3-13100F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100F vs 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10900T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+79%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	14,649	14,727
Geekbench 6 Single	2,272+33%	1,710
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,577+1%	7,476

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100F versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900T — the Core i3-13100F supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-13100F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-13100F) vs 16 (Core i9-10900T) — the Core i3-13100F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i3-13100F) and Z490,H470,B460,H410,Z590,B560,H510 (Core i9-10900T).

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10900T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i3-13100F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-13100F) vs Yes (Core i9-10900T). The Core i9-10900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-13100F requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10900T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-13100F was priced at $109, while the Core i9-10900T came in at $120. On launch pricing ($109 vs $120), Core i3-13100F was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100F delivers 134.4 pts/$ vs 122.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900T — making the Core i3-13100F the 9.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-13100F	Core i9-10900T
MSRP	$109-9%	$120
Performance per Dollar	134.4+10%	122.7
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i3-13100F on Amazon

Search Core i9-10900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.