
Core i3-13100F

Ryzen 7 5825C
Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 269.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 134.4 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌286.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 5825C
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 58W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i3-13100F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,145 vs 7,577).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 134.4 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-13100F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-13100F better than Ryzen 7 5825C?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100F
The Core i3-13100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,649 points. Launch price was $109.


Ryzen 7 5825C
The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825C offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5825C has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-13100F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100F scores 14,649 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-13100F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,272 vs 1,961, a 14.7% lead for the Core i3-13100F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 7,145 (5.9% advantage for the Core i3-13100F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,649 | 14,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,551 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,272+16% | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577+6% | 7,145 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-13100F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C — the Core i3-13100F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-13100F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-13100F) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i3-13100F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i3-13100F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i3-13100F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-13100F) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i3-13100F requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100F was priced at $109, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($109 vs $400), Core i3-13100F was $291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100F delivers 134.4 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Core i3-13100F the 114.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100F | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-73% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 134.4+269% | 36.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













