
Core i9-10900K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900K
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 5900HX.
Ryzen 9 5900HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.5 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-10900K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,198 vs 22,382).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Core i9-10900K
2020Ryzen 9 5900HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $233 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.5 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-10900K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 5900HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,198 vs 22,382).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900K better than Ryzen 9 5900HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 431 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 560 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5900HX

Core i9-10900K
Core i9-10900K
The Core i9-10900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,382 points. Launch price was $488.


Ryzen 9 5900HX
Ryzen 9 5900HX
The Ryzen 9 5900HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,198 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900K packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900K versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900HX — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-10900K uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900HX uses Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900K scores 22,382 against the Ryzen 9 5900HX's 22,198 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10900K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,382 | 22,198 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,955 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,845 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,587 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900HX uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i9-10900K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 400 series (Core i9-10900K) and FP6 (Ryzen 9 5900HX).
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900K) and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 5900HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10900K targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 5900HX targets Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900HX rivals Core i9-11980HK.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900K launched at $499 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900HX debuted at $266. On MSRP ($499 vs $266), the Ryzen 9 5900HX is $233 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900K delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 83.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900HX — making the Ryzen 9 5900HX the 60.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900K | Ryzen 9 5900HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $266-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9 | 83.5+86% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











