Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel

Core i9-10900KF

10 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900KF

2020

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,430).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($509 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
    • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

    Ryzen 7 3700X

    2019

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • +60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
    • Costs $180 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
    • Delivers 56.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
    • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i9-10900KF?
    Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $180 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $509 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.1% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 43.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900KF can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i9-10900KF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i9-10900KF

    The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 3700X

    The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

    Processing Power

    The Core i9-10900KF packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900KF (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-10900KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900KF scores 22,231 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900KF vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

    FeatureCore i9-10900KFRyzen 7 3700X
    Cores / Threads
    10 / 20+25%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    5.2 GHz+18%
    4.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.7 GHz+3%
    3.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    20 MB (total)
    32 MB+60%
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    512K (per core)+100%
    Process
    14 nm
    7 nm, 12 nm-50%
    Architecture
    Comet Lake (2020−2025)
    Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
    PassMark
    22,231
    22,430
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,767
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    9,261
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i9-10900KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900KF versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900KF) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

    FeatureCore i9-10900KFRyzen 7 3700X
    Socket
    LGA1200
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2933
    DDR4-3200+9%
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    24+50%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900KF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X).

    FeatureCore i9-10900KFRyzen 7 3700X
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i9-10900KF was priced at $509, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($509 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900KF delivers 43.7 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 43.8% better value option.

    FeatureCore i9-10900KFRyzen 7 3700X
    MSRP
    $509
    $329-35%
    Performance per Dollar
    43.7
    68.2+56%
    Release Date
    2020
    2019

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.