
Core i9-10900KF

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10900KF
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,231 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($509 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i9-10900KF?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900KF
The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900KF packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900KF (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-10900KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900KF scores 22,231 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900KF vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+18% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,231 | 22,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,767 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,261 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900KF versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900KF) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200+9% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900KF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10900KF was priced at $509, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($509 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900KF delivers 43.7 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 43.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $509 | $329-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.7 | 68.2+56% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













