Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Core i9-10900KF
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900KF
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($336) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($336) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900KF and Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Core i9-10900KF
The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900KF packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900KF (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10900KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900KF scores 22,231 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10900KF. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900KF vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+37% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,231 | 22,066 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,767 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,261 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900KF) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920).
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900KF launched at $509 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. At current prices ($336 vs $200), the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is $136 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900KF delivers 66.2 pts/$ vs 110.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 the 50% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900KF | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $509-36% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $336 | $200-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.2 | 110.3+67% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-10900KF and Ryzen Threadripper 1920
