Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 6800HS

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 6800HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900X

10 / 20

22,377

0.0%

22,652

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 6800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 6800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,377 vs 22,652).
❌Launch MSRP is still $590 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 6800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 6800HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Core i9-10900X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10900X is ahead with a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 6800HS pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i9-10900X also has the bigger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 6800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 6800HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 6800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $590 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-10900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 6800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 6800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900X

The Core i9-10900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,377 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,652 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 6800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10900X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 6800HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900X scores 22,377 against the Ryzen 7 6800HS's 22,652 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800HS. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Feature	Core i9-10900X	Ryzen 7 6800HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	19.25 MB (total)+20%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Cascade Lake-X (2019)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	22,377	22,652+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 6800HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.