
Core i9-10900X

Ryzen 5 8645HS
Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 8645HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 8645HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 8645HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10900X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $590 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8645HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i9-10900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,257 vs 22,377).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Core i9-10900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 8645HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900X
The Core i9-10900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,377 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i9-10900X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900X scores 22,377 against the Ryzen 5 8645HS's 22,257 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10900X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+20% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,377 | 22,257 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,316 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,574 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,675 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 8645HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10900X) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core i9-10900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












