Core i9-10980HK vs Core Ultra 7 165U

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 165U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-10980HK

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 165U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 7 165U

2023

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Core i9-10980HK needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,857 vs 17,037).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10980HK better than Core Ultra 7 165U?
Yes. Core i9-10980HK is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 11.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10980HK is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10980HK is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10980HK still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i9-10980HK is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 165U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
1080p
low267 FPS276 FPS
medium239 FPS248 FPS
high201 FPS209 FPS
ultra173 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low229 FPS230 FPS
medium185 FPS185 FPS
high151 FPS152 FPS
ultra133 FPS133 FPS
4K
low160 FPS160 FPS
medium130 FPS130 FPS
high100 FPS100 FPS
ultra88 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
1080p
low426 FPS214 FPS
medium359 FPS176 FPS
high312 FPS159 FPS
ultra273 FPS140 FPS
1440p
low402 FPS181 FPS
medium335 FPS155 FPS
high288 FPS143 FPS
ultra243 FPS122 FPS
4K
low268 FPS141 FPS
medium232 FPS124 FPS
high219 FPS118 FPS
ultra184 FPS101 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
1080p
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high426 FPS421 FPS
ultra426 FPS421 FPS
1440p
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high426 FPS421 FPS
ultra426 FPS421 FPS
4K
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high393 FPS409 FPS
ultra329 FPS342 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
1080p
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high426 FPS421 FPS
ultra426 FPS421 FPS
1440p
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high426 FPS421 FPS
ultra426 FPS421 FPS
4K
low426 FPS421 FPS
medium426 FPS421 FPS
high426 FPS421 FPS
ultra426 FPS403 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10980HK and Core Ultra 7 165U

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165U

The Core Ultra 7 165U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,857 points. Launch price was $448.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165U — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i9-10980HK uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980HK scores 17,037 against the Core Ultra 7 165U's 16,857 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980HK vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165U.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 14+50%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+4%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+41%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+700%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake-H (2020)
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
PassMark
17,037+1%
16,857
Geekbench 6 Single
2,350
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
Socket
BGA1440
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10980HK) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 165U). The Core Ultra 7 165U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Core i9-10980HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 165U targets Premium Laptop.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKCore Ultra 7 165U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Premium Laptop