
Core i9-10980HK
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 165U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10980HK
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 165U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Core i9-10980HK needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,857 vs 17,037).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i9-10980HK
2020Core Ultra 7 165U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Core i9-10980HK needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 165U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 165U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,857 vs 17,037).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980HK better than Core Ultra 7 165U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 403 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10980HK and Core Ultra 7 165U

Core i9-10980HK
Core i9-10980HK
The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.

Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U
The Core Ultra 7 165U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,857 points. Launch price was $448.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165U — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i9-10980HK uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980HK scores 17,037 against the Core Ultra 7 165U's 16,857 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980HK vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165U.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 14+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+41% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Meteor Lake-P (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,037+1% | 16,857 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10980HK) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 165U). The Core Ultra 7 165U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Core i9-10980HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 165U targets Premium Laptop.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | Core Ultra 7 165U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Premium Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












