Core i9-10980HK vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i9-10980HK vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10980HK vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10980HK vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10980HK

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i9-10980HK.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,037).
  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i9-10980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10980HK better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?
Yes. Core i9-10980HK is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10980HK is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10980HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10980HK is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-10980HK comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10980HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10980HK vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-10980HK and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-10980HK uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980HK scores 17,037 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKRyzen 7 PRO 2700X
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+24%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Comet Lake-H (2020)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
17,037
16,959
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,243
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKRyzen 7 PRO 2700X
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10980HK) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

FeatureCore i9-10980HKRyzen 7 PRO 2700X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation