
Core i9-10980HK

M1 Pro
Core i9-10980HK vs M1 Pro Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10980HK vs M1 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10980HK vs M1 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10980HK
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,037 vs 17,218).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while M1 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is M1 Pro better than Core i9-10980HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10980HK vs M1 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10980HK
The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the M1 Pro offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the M1 Pro has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK versus 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.064 GHz). The Core i9-10980HK is built on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10980HK scores 17,037 against the M1 Pro's 17,218 — a 1.1% lead for the M1 Pro. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980HK vs 24 MB on the M1 Pro.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 10+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+58% | 3.22 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+16% | 2.064 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 28 MB+11100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,037 | 17,218+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M1 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10980HK | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













