
Core i9-11900KB

Xeon W-1370
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-11900KB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Xeon W-1370 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,693 vs 22,948).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.1 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($539 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
Xeon W-1370
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $539 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $539 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900KB across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-11900KB can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1370 better than Core i9-11900KB?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900KB
The Core i9-11900KB is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Maio 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,693 points. Launch price was $539.

Xeon W-1370
The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11900KB and Xeon W-1370 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900KB versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i9-11900KB uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900KB scores 22,693 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-1370. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900KB vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+14% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,693 | 22,948+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,264 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,645 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900KB uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900KB) / not specified (Xeon W-1370). The Core i9-11900KB includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon W-1370 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-11900KB was priced at $539, while the Xeon W-1370 came in at $323. On launch pricing ($539 vs $323), Xeon W-1370 was $216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-11900KB delivers 42.1 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370 — making the Xeon W-1370 the 51.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Xeon W-1370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $539 | $323-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1 | 71.0+69% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














