
Core i9-11900KF

Ryzen 5 8400F
Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 8400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 8400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 8400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-11900KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.9 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8400F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.0 vs 47.9 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,585).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900KF better than Ryzen 5 8400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 8400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900KF
The Core i9-11900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 24,585 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8400F
The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11900KF packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900KF versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900KF (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-11900KF uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8400F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900KF scores 24,585 against the Ryzen 5 8400F's 24,554 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-11900KF. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+11% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 24,585 | 24,554 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8400F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900KF) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8400F).
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-11900KF was priced at $513, while the Ryzen 5 8400F came in at $303. On launch pricing ($513 vs $303), Ryzen 5 8400F was $210 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-11900KF delivers 47.9 pts/$ vs 81.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 8400F — making the Ryzen 5 8400F the 51.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $513 | $303-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.9 | 81.0+69% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














