
Core i9-12900E

EPYC 7401P
Core i9-12900E vs EPYC 7401P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900E vs EPYC 7401P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900E vs EPYC 7401P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900E
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7401P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7401P
2017Why buy it
- β +113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (27,836 vs 28,170).
- β138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900E better than EPYC 7401P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900E vs EPYC 7401P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900E
The Core i9-12900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,170 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7401P
The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017β2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7401P offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the EPYC 7401P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900E versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P β a 50% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900E (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-12900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7401P uses Naples (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900E scores 28,170 against the EPYC 7401P's 27,836 β a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-12900E. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900E vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P.
| Feature | Core i9-12900E | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+67% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+15% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Naples (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 28,170+1% | 27,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,420 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,107 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7401P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900E | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900E) / not specified (EPYC 7401P). The Core i9-12900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7401P requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-12900E | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














