PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-12900E vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-12900E vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-12900E

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+55.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Costs $612 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 124.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,420 vs 19,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅+41.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 56.3 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12900E better than Xeon W-2275?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2275 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-12900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2275 is the stronger fit. You are getting 41.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-12900E is the better buy right now. Core i9-12900E comes in $612 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $1,112 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-2275 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 41.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 124.0% better value on MSRP (56.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-12900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 55.8% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 19 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-12900E vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900E

The Core i9-12900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,170 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Core i9-12900E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900E versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900E (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900E is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-12900E scores 28,170 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-12900E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,420 vs 19,000 (34.4% advantage for the Xeon W-2275). Multi-core Geekbench: 13,107 vs 11,000 (17.5% advantage for the Core i9-12900E). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900E vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	Core i9-12900E	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+14%	14 / 28
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+56%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	—
PassMark	28,170	27,974
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,420	19,000+42%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,596
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,107+19%	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12900E versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 — the Core i9-12900E supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900E) vs 4 (Xeon W-2275). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900E) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900E) and C422 (Xeon W-2275).

Feature	Core i9-12900E	Xeon W-2275
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). The Core i9-12900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-2275 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Core i9-12900E	Xeon W-2275
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Professional Content Creation / VFX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-12900E was priced at $500, while the Xeon W-2275 came in at $1112. On launch pricing ($500 vs $1112), Core i9-12900E was $612 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900E delivers 56.3 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Core i9-12900E the 76.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-12900E	Xeon W-2275
MSRP	$500-55%	$1112
Performance per Dollar	56.3+123%	25.2
Release Date	2022	2019

Search Core i9-12900E on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.