Core i9-12900H
VS
M2 Max

Core i9-12900H vs M2 Max

Intel

Core i9-12900H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2022
VS

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-12900H

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
101%
#160
Core i9-12900H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Max

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
126%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
126%
#201
M2 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-12900H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the M2 Max in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i9-12900HM2 Max
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-H (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i9-12900HM2 Max
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900H and M2 Max

Intel

Core i9-12900H

The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i9-12900H is built on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-12900H scores 27,079 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-12900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.

FeatureCore i9-12900HM2 Max
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+17%
12 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz+35%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+3%
2.424 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
48 MB+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
36 MB+2780%
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Alder Lake-H (2022)
PassMark
27,079
26,824
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The M2 Max supports up to 96 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900H) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900H) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the Core i9-12900H offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i9-12900HM2 Max
Socket
FCBGA1744
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
96 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-12900H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-12900H) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-12900H) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900H targets Mobile, M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i9-12900HM2 Max
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
Virtualization
Target Use
Mobile
Mobile