Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-12900H

Intel

Core i5-13400E

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i9-12900H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2022

Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-12900H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-12900H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-12900H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $396 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 178.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-12900H.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 16,500).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
  • ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i9-12900H

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12900H better than Core i5-13400E?
Yes. Core i9-12900H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.3% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-12900H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-12900H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-12900H comes in 179.2% more expensive on MSRP at $617 MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400E is also 178.4% better value on MSRP (122.2 vs 43.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-13400E vs Core i9-12900H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i9-12900H

The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-12900H offers 14 cores / 20 threads β€” the Core i9-12900H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H β€” a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-12900H uses Alder Lake-H (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Core i9-12900H's 27,079 β€” a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-12900H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,953 vs 16,500 (3.4% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,375 vs 2,400, a 1% lead for the Core i9-12900H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 12,900 (25.6% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H.

FeatureCore i5-13400ECore i9-12900H
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
14 / 20+40%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Alder Lake-H (2022)
PassMark
27,000
27,079
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,953
16,500+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,375
2,400+1%
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,977
12,900+29%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-12900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and Intel 600 Series (Mobile) (Core i9-12900H).

FeatureCore i5-13400ECore i9-12900H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
20
20
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-12900H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β€” a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs Yes (Core i9-12900H). Both include integrated graphics β€” UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-12900H) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, Core i9-12900H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400ECore i9-12900H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 730
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Yes
Target Use
Productivity
Mobile
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400E was priced at $221, while the Core i9-12900H came in at $617. On launch pricing ($221 vs $617), Core i5-13400E was $396 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 43.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900H β€” making the Core i5-13400E the 94.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400ECore i9-12900H
MSRP
$221-64%
$617
Performance per Dollar
122.2+178%
43.9
Release Date
2023
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.