PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400E vs Core Ultra 5 225T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400E vs Core Ultra 5 225T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

✅+11.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,943 vs 9,977).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.0 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400E better than Core Ultra 5 225T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 225T is ahead with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400E pulls ahead with 11.6% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400E is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400E is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400E comes in $19 cheaper on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $240 MSRP, and it still gives you 11.6% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Core Ultra 5 225T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.1% better value on MSRP (122.2 vs 112.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1851 + DDR5 setup, Core Ultra 5 225T is still an elite gaming CPU and a very strong platform-matched choice because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap while remaining one of the strongest gaming chips you can buy.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400E vs Core Ultra 5 225T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 225T's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13400E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,375 vs 2,677, a 12% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 8,943 (10.9% advantage for the Core i5-13400E). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core Ultra 5 225T
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 10
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+140%
Process	10 nm	3 nm-70%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	27,000	26,874
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,953	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,375	2,677+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,977+12%	8,943

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400E versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225T — the Core Ultra 5 225T supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400E) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T).

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core Ultra 5 225T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Arc Graphics (16EU) (Core Ultra 5 225T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core Ultra 5 225T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD 730	Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Productivity	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400E was priced at $221, while the Core Ultra 5 225T came in at $240. On launch pricing ($221 vs $240), Core i5-13400E was $19 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 112.0 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225T — making the Core i5-13400E the 8.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP	$221-8%	$240
Performance per Dollar	122.2+9%	112.0
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i5-13400E on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 225T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.